A map is like an encyclopedia. You trust it to be correct and unbiased.
A trail is like a novel. You trust the author to take you on an adventure.
Maps make a big space seem smaller and more understandable. They allow us to see patterns that are not obvious from the ground.
Trails can make a small space seem vast. Landscape designers know that a well composed trail can make a short stroll feel like a real journey.
Maps are about planning. You plot your course and carefully follow it.
Trails are about spontaneity. You show up at the trailhead knowing roughly its length and difficulty. That’s it. You set off.
I don’t want to imply that one is better than the other. Following a bicycle trail with no map can be an unnerving experience. It’s nice to know roughly where you are in case you lose the trail.
Similarly, planning a course on an unfamiliar map can be disappointing. You are left to guess at road conditions, scenery and local attractions.
Computers are great at creating maps. And they are getting better every day. They display complete and accurate information. They show you the shortest distance from A to B. What more could you want?
How about the human touch? Trails are designed by people for people. They invite you to follow along. They entertain. They surprise.
A bike route should be an urban trail. More than just a loop, it should be a full composition with an introduction, a climax and a resolution. It should feel like a trip.
Am I taking this all too seriously? Can a simple spin around town live up to these high ideals? It’s worth a shot.
